Another prime thread! Its that time of year again when people start asking me what I want for x-mas, so naturally, photo gear. I've been thinking about asking my parents for either of the less-expensive Nikon primes; the 50mm 1.8 or the 35mm 1.8. Since both are close in price and relatively inexpensive I want to know people's take on both. For a while I thought the 50mm was the way to go. Of the numerous reviews I read, almost no one had anything bad to say about it. But lately I've been shooting more wide than anything else (not that the 35mm is that wide, but it's obviously wider than the 50mm), plus the 35mm is AF-S which will auto-focus on my D40x where the 50mm will not. I have read that the 50mm is super sharp and an all around very nice lens, is the 35mm the same? There don't seem to be quite as many reviews on the 35mm as the 50mm so that's why Im asking here. I have not shot with either so I have no bias.
Thoughts on either/both?
Just so we're clear I am talking about the f/1.8 only. The 1.4's are more expensive than I'm comfortable asking for for christmas.
Thoughts on either/both?
Just so we're clear I am talking about the f/1.8 only. The 1.4's are more expensive than I'm comfortable asking for for christmas.