Joanie Eddis-Koch
Member
Next we have Mr. Scrooge. I was using the 24 to 70 Nikon lens. This is the lens that is recommended as having the best performance and clarity for a zoom in this range. It's all glass and it's heavy, but boy does it do pretty much exactly what you want it to do within it's given range. I ordered the D4 about two weeks after my cancer surgery. With a new lease on life I had made the decision to "go for it" and spend the $$$ to get a camera with few limitations so I could really 'fly' with my photography. I did not however decide on a lens when I ordered this as I needed more time to think it over and I was in no shape to do the detailed comparison between all the other full frame lenses. So I spent weeks waiting for the D4 to come in and thinking is the 24-70 the lens for me?
When using the D90 I LOVED the 18-105 I was using. That translates to about 30 to 150 something on a full frame lens. The 24-70 was way shorter than that. Could I live with that I wondered. I thought about what I really wanted, and that was a lens that was as excellent as it could be across it's range. So that lens would have to be the 24-70.
I loved the clarity and low light performance this 2.8 beauty provided. If there is a dead spot in this lens I haven't found it yet. But I did miss the added range that the DX 18-105 gave me for this shot. I would never consider using a crop sensor lens (DX) for a shoot like this with a full frame camera.
I had an interesting dilemma when shooting this parade. If you were shooting the floats coming straight on you almost needed a longer zoom so you could capture the details or a character on the float better. The flatness of that straight on shot didn't do the floats justice (IMHO) since you could only capture the front, which was minus many of the interesting details that were seen on these floats . The straight on shots were great for capturing the animated stylings of the characters IF you had the reach with your lens. This Scrooge shot is where I ran into a limitation with that 24-70. Still, shooting full frame allowed me to crop it somewhat.

MVMCP Uncle Scrooge by Disney Photography Phanatic, on Flickr
When using the D90 I LOVED the 18-105 I was using. That translates to about 30 to 150 something on a full frame lens. The 24-70 was way shorter than that. Could I live with that I wondered. I thought about what I really wanted, and that was a lens that was as excellent as it could be across it's range. So that lens would have to be the 24-70.
I loved the clarity and low light performance this 2.8 beauty provided. If there is a dead spot in this lens I haven't found it yet. But I did miss the added range that the DX 18-105 gave me for this shot. I would never consider using a crop sensor lens (DX) for a shoot like this with a full frame camera.
I had an interesting dilemma when shooting this parade. If you were shooting the floats coming straight on you almost needed a longer zoom so you could capture the details or a character on the float better. The flatness of that straight on shot didn't do the floats justice (IMHO) since you could only capture the front, which was minus many of the interesting details that were seen on these floats . The straight on shots were great for capturing the animated stylings of the characters IF you had the reach with your lens. This Scrooge shot is where I ran into a limitation with that 24-70. Still, shooting full frame allowed me to crop it somewhat.

MVMCP Uncle Scrooge by Disney Photography Phanatic, on Flickr